Legislature(1999 - 2000)
2000-04-24 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2000-04-24 House Journal Page 3468 HB 420 Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 3343) on the following at this time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 420(FIN)(efd pfld) "An Act relating to tourism marketing contracts; and providing for an effective date." and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 420(L&C) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Cissna placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Representative Green moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 420(FIN)(efd pfld), thus adopting SCS CSHB 420(L&C), and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 420(FIN)(efd pfld)?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2000-04-24 House Journal Page 3469 HB 420 SCS CSHB 420(L&C) Concur YEAS: 29 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kemplen, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses, Smalley Absent: Kookesh And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS CSHB 420(L&C). Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clauses. Representative Berkowitz objected. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw the motion. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause in Section 4. Representative Davies objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, the effective date clause in Section 4 was adopted. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause in Section 5. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2000-04-24 House Journal Page 3470 HB 420 Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause in Section 6. Representative Berkowitz objected. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause in Section 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 420(L&C) Concur Effective Date - Section 6 YEAS: 27 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses, Smalley And so, the effective date clause in Section 6 was adopted. The Chief Clerk was instructed to so notify the Senate. SCS CSHB 420(L&C) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.